Goto Section: 90.673 | 90.675 | Table of Contents
FCC 90.674
Revised as of October 1, 2016
Goto Year:2015 |
2017
§ 90.674 Interference resolution procedures before, during and after band
reconfiguration.
(a) Initial Notification. Any non-cellular licensee operating in the
806-824/851-869 MHz band who reasonably believes it is receiving
unacceptable interference, as described in § 90.672, shall provide an
initial notification of the interference incident. This initial
notification of an interference incident shall be sent to all part 22
of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees and ESMR licensees
who operate cellular base stations (“cell sites”) within 1,524 meters
(5,000 feet) of the interference incident.
(1) The initial notification of interference shall include the
following information on interference:
(i) The specific geographical location where the interference occurs,
and the time or times at which the interference occurred or is
occurring;
(ii) A description of its scope and severity, including its source, if
known;
(iii) The relevant Commission licensing information of the party
suffering the interference; and
(iv) A single point of contact for the party suffering the
interference.
(2) ESMR licensees, in conjunction with part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone
licensees, shall establish an electronic means of receiving the initial
notification described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The
electronic system must be designed so that all appropriate 800 MHz ESMR
and part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone licensees can be contacted about
the interference incident with a single notification. The electronic
system for receipt of initial notification of interference complaints
must be operating no later than February 22, 2005.
(3) ESMR licensees must respond to the initial notification described
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, as soon as possible and no later
than 24 hours of receipt of notification from a public safety/CII
licensee. This response time may be extended to 48 hours after receipt
from other non-cellular licensees provided affected communications on
these systems are not safety related.
(b) Interference analysis. ESMR licensees—who receive an initial
notification described in paragraph (a) of this section—shall perform a
timely analysis of the interference to identify the possible source.
Immediate on-site visits may be conducted when necessary to complete
timely analysis. Interference analysis must be completed and corrective
action initiated within 48 hours of the initial complaint from a public
safety/CII licensee. This response time may be extended to 96 hours
after the initial complaint from other non-cellular licensees provided
affected communications on these systems are not safety related.
Corrective action may be delayed if the affected licensee agrees in
writing (which may be, but is not required to be, recorded via e-mail
or other electronic means) to a longer period.
(c) Mitigation Steps. (1) All 800 MHz cellular system licensees and
part 22 of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees who are
responsible for causing unacceptable interference shall take all
affirmative measures to resolve such interference. 800 MHz cellular
system licensees found to contribute to harmful interference, as
defined in § 90.672, shall resolve such interference in the shortest
time practicable. 800 MHz cellular system licensees and part 22 of this
chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees must provide all necessary
test apparatus and technical personnel skilled in the operation of such
equipment as may be necessary to determine the most appropriate means
of timely eliminating the interference. However, the means whereby
interference is abated or the cell parameters that may need to be
adjusted is left to the discretion of involved 800 MHz cellular system
licensees and/or part 22 of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone
licensees, whose affirmative measures may include, but not be limited
to, the following techniques:
(i) Increasing the desired power of the public safety signal;
(ii) Decreasing the power of the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular
Radiotelephone signal;
(iii) Modifying the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone systems
antenna height;
(iv) Modifying the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone system
antenna characteristics;
(v) Incorporating filters into ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular
Radiotelephone system transmission equipment;
(vi) Permanently changing ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone
system frequencies; and
(vii) Supplying interference-resistant receivers to the affected public
safety licensee(s). If this technique is used, in all circumstances,
the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone licensees shall be
responsible for all costs thereof.
(2) Whenever short-term interference abatement measures prove
inadequate, the affected licensee shall, consistent with but not
compromising safety, make all necessary concessions to accepting
interference until a longer-term remedy can be implemented.
(3) Discontinuing operations when clear and imminent danger exists.
When a public safety licensee determines that a continuing presence of
interference constitutes a clear and imminent danger to life or
property, the licensee causing the interference must discontinue the
associated operation immediately, until a remedy can be identified and
applied. The determination that a continuing presence exists that
constitutes a clear and imminent danger to life or property, must be
made by written statement that:
(i) Is in the form of a declaration, notarized affidavit, or statement
under penalty or perjury, from an officer or executive of the affected
public safety licensee;
(ii) Thoroughly describes the basis of the claim of clear and imminent
danger;
(iii) Was formulated on the basis of either personal knowledge or
belief after due diligence;
(iv) Is not proffered by a contractor or other third party; and
(v) Has been approved by the Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau or other designated Commission official. Prior to the
authorized official making a determination that a clear and imminent
danger exists, the associated written statement must be served by
hand-delivery or receipted fax on the applicable offending licensee,
with a copy transmitted by the fastest available means to the
Washington, DC office of the Commission's Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau.
[ 69 FR 67849 , Nov. 22, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 76711 , Dec. 28, 2005;
71 FR 69038 , Nov. 29, 2006]
return arrow Back to Top
Goto Section: 90.673 | 90.675
Goto Year: 2015 |
2017
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public